US20260091861A1
Cage Deployment System
Publication
Application
Classifications
IPC Classifications
CPC Classifications
Applicants
Oceaneering International, Inc.
Inventors
Torleif CARLSEN
Abstract
Cage deployment system ( 1 ) typically comprises a remotely powered/controlled lift; a module guide adapted to ensure that a selectively removable and insertable seabed module self-aligns into a cage extension; and a subsea cage operatively connected to the remotely powered/controlled lift. Cage deployment system ( 1 ) may be used by positioning remotely operated vehicle (ROV) ( 500 ) in subsea cage ( 200 ); inserting subsea module ( 400 ) into skid slot ( 203 ) of subsea cage ( 200 ); deploying cage deployment system ( 1 ) to a predetermined location at sea; using remotely powered/controlled lift ( 100 ) as a lowering mechanism to lower subsea cage ( 200 ) to and deploying it proximate seabed ( 2 ); allowing ROV ( 500 ) to exit subsea cage ( 200 ); allowing subsea cage ( 200 ) to release subsea module interlock ( 220 ) and thereby secure seabed module ( 400 ); lowering seabed module ( 400 ) from subsea cage ( 200 ) to a seabed location.
Figures
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001]This application claims priority through U.S. Provisional Application 63/701,645 filed on Oct. 1, 2024, incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002]There are several problems with current deployment systems including a lack of a subsea crane and of a tugger winch to deploy a subsea basket. There is also often a lack of deck space for a subsea basket. Current remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) do not have capacity to deploy units that offer enough stability. In addition, conventional ROV systems and hangars lack support systems for heavy loads and the ROV industry (most of the offshore industry) base topside rigging on sub-optimal manual handling and cranes in hangars are expensive and fixed.
[0003]Further, using ROVs to move heavy loads subsea is not sustainable in part because many existing and, as designed, future ROVs struggle to handle equipment heavier than ˜100 kg but a resident tooling platform needs to be close to 1 metric ton (MT).
[0004]There is also a suction problem.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0005]Various figures are included herein which illustrate aspects of embodiments of the disclosed inventions.
[0006]
[0007]
[0008]
[0009]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
[0010]In a first embodiment, referring generally to
[0011]In certain embodiments, cage deployment system 1 does not require a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) 500 for support. In embodiments, cage deployment system 1 may be field cage installable.
[0012]Referring additionally to
[0013]Typically, housing 201 comprises a substantially rectangular or cuboid frame dimensioned to accept selectively removable and insertable seabed module 400 therein and an upper domed area. The frame typically comprises elevator 201A (
[0014]In the operation of exemplary methods, referring back to
[0015]If present, ROV 500 may provide support or cage system 1 can be designed to avoid or eliminate ROV (500) support.
[0016]The position of subsea cage 200 may be shifted to vertically align subsea cage 200 with subsea module 400 and subsea cage 200 used to pay out lift line 230; ROV 500 used to connect lift line 230 to subsea module 400 and to drive/operate an extension/stability mechanism to a docking position; and subsea cage 200 used to hoist seabed module 400 into subsea cage 200 to lock subsea module 400 in place within subsea cage 200.
[0017]In embodiments, ROV 500 may be deployed and used to disconnect lifting interface 202 from subsea cage 200 and used to drive/operate an extension system to lift subsea module 400 and subsea cage 200 shifted to a predetermined position which may be or otherwise comprise an optimal operational location subsea. In these embodiments, ROV 500 may be allowed to continue work or to dock into subsea cage 200 after subsea module 400 is locked in place.
[0018]It will be appreciated that the disclosed cage system 1 and its method of use can achieve its functions while not requiring high power currently required from an ROV (500) based system, which can be especially important as there will likely be restrictions on power draw in the future from all offshore systems e.g., to minimize diesel/gas turbine generator usage. Further, the disclosed cage system 1 provides an increased overall efficiency when a subsea crane or tugger winch is not available; reduces deck space compared to subsea basket; and can be used to perform heavy lift without crane/tugger. In embodiments which comprise ROV 500, ROV 500 can position subsea module 400 to void current 1 metric tonne MT restrictions.
[0019]In embodiments, subsea cage 200 is field cage installable with a total weight lower than 2MT. Cage system 1 can provide a robust and tangle free lowering system and simplified seabed elevation, including seabed penetration prevention, without protruding outside cage frame and maximum extensions
[0020]The foregoing disclosure and description of the inventions are illustrative and explanatory. Various changes in the size, shape, and materials, as well as in the details of the illustrative construction and/or an illustrative method may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1) A cage deployment system, comprising:
a) a remotely powered/controlled lift;
b) a module guide adapted to ensure that a selectively removable and insertable seabed module self-aligns into a cage extension; and
c) a subsea cage operatively connected to the remotely powered/controlled lift, the subsea cage comprising:
i) a housing;
ii) a quick connect lifting interface operatively connected to the housing and configured to selectively connect or disconnect to the subsea module; and
iii) a skid slot disposed at least partially within the housing and defining the cage extension.
2) The cage deployment system of
a) the subsea cage comprises a subsea in-field cage that weighs less than two metric tons; and
b) the cage deployment system does not require a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) for support.
3) The cage deployment system of
4) The cage deployment system of
a) an elevator; and
b) an elevator mover.
5) The cage deployment system of
6) The cage deployment system of
7) The cage deployment system of
8) The cage deployment system of
9) A method for installation of the cage deployment system of
a) positioning a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) in the subsea cage;
b) inserting a subsea module into the skid slot of the subsea cage;
c) deploying the cage deployment system to a predetermined location at sea;
d) deploying the subsea cage subsea;
e) using the remotely powered/controlled lift to lower the subsea cage to a seabed;
f) allowing the ROV to exit the subsea cage;
g) allowing the subsea cage to release the subsea module interlock securing the seabed module;
h) lowering the seabed module from the subsea cage to a seabed location;
i) using the ROV to disconnect the lifting interface from the subsea cage;
j) spooling the lift line back into the subsea cage;
k) using the ROV to drive/operate an extension system to lift the subsea module; and
l) shifting the subsea cage to a predetermined position.
10) The method for installation of the cage deployment system of
11) The method for installation of the cage deployment system of
12) The method for installation of the cage deployment system of
13) The method for installation of the cage deployment system of
a) shifting the subsea cage position to vertically align the subsea cage with the subsea module;
b) using the subsea cage to pay out the lift line;
c) using the ROV to connect the lift line to the subsea module;
d) using the ROV to drive/operate an extension/stability mechanism to a docking position;
e) using the subsea cage to hoist the seabed module into the subsea cage; and
f) using the subsea cage to lock the subsea module in place within the subsea cage.
14) The method of
15) The method of