USPP37170P3
Publication
Application
Classifications
IPC Classifications
CPC Classifications
Applicants
NATIONAL AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH ORGANIZATION
Inventors
Ryoji Matsumoto, Toshio Takahara, Terutaka Yoshioka, Naofumi Hiehata, Takeshi Kuniga, Atsushi Imai, Satoshi Ota, Hiroshi Fukamachi, Keisuke Nonaka, Hiroko Hamada, Shingo Goto, Ayami Hisanaga, Tomoaki Watanabe
Abstract
A new variety of Citrus sp. tree ‘HAYASE’ that has medium tree habit in-between upright and spreading, spindle-shaped leaf blade with acuminate apex and acute base, vestigial wing, fruit with high diameter/height ratio (average 1.31) and medium to heavy weight (average 152.3 g), no neck, a flat distal part, bright orange (JHS 1305) skin color, thin peel thickness, easy to medium peeling, deep orange (JHS 1307) color when fresh, juicy when fresh, high sweetness, very few seeds, early maturity, and low acidity.
Figures
Description
[0001]Common name: Mandarin.
[0002]Botanical classification: Citrus sp.
[0003]Variety denomination: ‘HAYASE’.
BACKGROUND OF THE NEW VARIETY
[0004]The present invention relates to a new and distinct variety of Mandarin, Citrus sp., which has been given the variety denomination ‘HAYASE’.
ORIGIN OF THE VARIETY
[0005]The parent varieties are ‘TSUNONOZOMI’ (female parent) (not patented in the U.S.), and ‘SETOKA’ (male parent) (not patented in the U.S.) respectively.
[0006]The variety was developed and propagated in Minami-Shimabara, Nagasaki, Japan.
[0007]The variety was reproduced asexually by vegetative reproduction by top grafting one-year-old scions on rootstocks, also in Minami-Shimabara, Nagasaki, Japan. The rootstock used was satsuma mandarin (not patented) as an interstock grafted onto Poncirus trifoliata (trifoliate orange).
[0008]In 2001, the parent varieties were crossed. Seeds were collected to be grown in the next year.
[0009]In 2002, seeds were grown and seedlings were grafted on top of ‘Shiikuwasha’ rootstock.
[0010]In 2005, first fruiting was observed.
[0011]In 2008, preliminary individual selection and characteristics evaluation were performed. Selected plants were grafted on top of satsuma mandarin interstock.
[0012]In 2017, the plant was named ‘Kankitsu kuchinotsu 53’ as a provisional name for a promising breeding line. Growing tests for local adaptability were started under confidentiality conditions.
[0013]In 2023, breeding was completed with DUS status confirmed (distinct, uniform, and stable), whereby it was confirmed that the instant tree reproduces true to type in successive generations of asexual reproduction.
[0014]In 2024, the variety was named ‘HAYASE’ and PVP application No. 37,416 was filed on May 8, 2024 in the Plant Variety Protection Office in Japan, whose content is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
[0015]Cultivation of the variety does not require special conditions or treatments.
[0016]The variety is currently mainly intended for fruit production.
SUMMARY OF THE VARIETY
[0017]This new mandarin plant ‘HAYASE’ has tree habit in-between upright and spreading, spindle-shaped leaf blade with acuminate apex and acute base, vestigial wing, fruit with high diameter/height ratio (average 1.34) and medium weight (average 149.9 g), no neck, a flat distal part, bright orange (JHS 1305) skin color, thin peel thickness, easy to medium peeling, deep orange (JHS 1307) color when fresh, juicy when fresh, high sweetness, very few seeds, early maturity, and low acidity.
[0018]Specifically, Table 1 below shows a comparison between the instant variety ‘HAYASE’ and the female parent ‘TSUNONOZOMI’ as follows (evaluation based on averages):
| TABLE 1 |
|---|
| Comparison between ‘HAYASE’ and |
| ‘TSUNONOZOMI’ |
| Female parent | Present | ||
| ‘TSUNON- | variety | ||
| OZOMI’ | ‘HAYASE’ | ||
| No. | Characteristics | Descriptions | Descriptions |
| 9 | One year old | medium (16%) | few (5%) |
| shoot: spine | |||
| (number of | |||
| spines per | |||
| leaf nodes) (%) | |||
| 46 | Style shape | curved | straight |
| 51 | Fruit: shape of | sinking | flattened |
| distal part | |||
| 85 | Seeds | few to medium | very few |
| (6.2 seeds/fruit) | (0.8 seeds/ | ||
| fruit) | |||
| 87 | Polyembryony | absent | present |
[0020]Table 2 below shows a comparison between the instant variety ‘HAYASE’ and the male parent ‘SETOKA’, which is also a comparative variety.
| TABLE 2 |
|---|
| Comparison between ‘HAYASE’ and ‘SETOKA’ |
| Reference | Present | ||
| variety | variety | ||
| ‘SETOKA’ | ‘HAYASE’ | ||
| No. | Characteristics | Descriptions | Descriptions |
| 9 | One-year old shoot: | many (62%) | few (5%) |
| spine (number of | |||
| spines per | |||
| leaf nodes) (%) | |||
| 44 | Pollens | few | none |
| 46 | Style shape | curved | straight |
| 62 | Fruit weight | heavy | medium |
| (209.1 g) | (149.9 g) | ||
| 84 | Acidity | medium | low |
| to high | (0.90 g/ | ||
| (1.34 g/ | 100 ml) | ||
| 100 ml) | |||
[0022]The fruit of ‘HAYASE’ having few spines on a one year old shoot, no pollen, a straight-style shape, medium to heavy weight, and low acidity, distinguishes it notably from comparative variety ‘SETOKA’ (not patented in US) having many spines on one year old shoot, few pollens, a curved-style shape, heavy weight, and medium to high acidity.
[0023]Table 3 below shows a comparison between the instant variety ‘HAYASE’ and the comparative variety ‘ASUMI’ (not patented in U.S.).
| TABLE 3 |
|---|
| Comparison between ‘HAYASE’ and ‘ASUMI’ |
| Reference | Present | ||
| variety | variety | ||
| ‘ASUMI’ | ‘HAYASE’ | ||
| No. | Characteristics | Descriptions | Descriptions |
| 9 | One-year old shoot: | intermediate | few (5%) |
| spine (number of | (29%) | ||
| spines per | |||
| leaf nodes) (%) | |||
| 44 | Pollens | medium | none |
| 46 | Style shape | curved | straight |
| 84 | Acidity | medium | low |
| (1.23 g/ | (0.90 g/ | ||
| 100 ml) | 100 ml) | ||
| 87 | Polyembryony | absent | present |
[0025]Table 4 below shows a comparison between the instant variety ‘HAYASE’ and the comparative variety ‘ASUKI’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 31,146 P3).
| TABLE 4 |
|---|
| Comparison between ‘HAYASE’ and ‘ASUKI’ |
| Reference | Present | ||
| variety | variety | ||
| ‘ASUKI’ | ‘HAYASE’ | ||
| No. | Characteristics | Descriptions | Descriptions |
| 44 | Pollens | few | none |
| 46 | Style shape | curved | straight |
| 84 | Acidity | medium | low |
| to high | (0.90 g/ | ||
| (1.30 g/ | 100 ml) | ||
| 100 ml) | |||
| 87 | Polyembryony | absent | present |
| 91 | Time of maturity of | late | early |
| fruit for consumption | (March) | (January) | |
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0027]In the accompanying drawings, which are as nearly true as is reasonable possible to make in a color illustration of this type:
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]Due to chemical and/or digital development, processing and printing, the plants or portions of plants depicted in the photographs may or may not be precisely accurate, when compared to the actual botanical specimens.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0038]Table 3 below shows the botanical description of the ‘HAYASE’ plants evaluated in 2022 and 2023 (including the comparison with the reference plant ‘SETOKA’). The values provided are averages. The ages of the trees evaluated was 7 years, and the location of the trees evaluated was Shizuoka-city, Shizuoka, Japan.
[0039]The ‘HAYASE’ plants shown on the photographs were grown at Shizuoka-city, Shizuoka, Japan. The plants were 7-year grown trees after top grafting. The tree was photographed on Nov. 24, 2023, the flowers were photographed on Apr. 30, 2023, and the fruits were photographed on Jan. 5, 2023.
[0040]Colors are given according to the J.H.S. (Japan Horticultural Society) Color Chart.
BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION
| TABLE 5 |
|---|
| Botanical description of ‘HAYASE’ |
| No. | Characteristics | Descriptions | Values |
| 1. | Tree habit | in-between | |
| upright | |||
| and spreading | |||
| 2. | Shoot density | dense | |
| 3. | Tree size: average height | 2.3 m | |
| 4. | Tree size: average spread | 2.4 m | |
| 5. | Tree vigor | medium | |
| 6. | One year old shoot: diameter | medium | 2.7 mm |
| 7. | One year old shoot: length | medium | 11.9 cm |
| 8. | One year old shoot: internode | medium | 1.7 cm |
| 9. | One year old shoot: spine (number | few | 5% |
| of spines per leaf nodes) (%) | |||
| 10. | Spine: average size | very short | 1.9 mm |
| 11. | Spine: average color | dull greenish | JHS 2910 |
| yellow | |||
| 12. | Leaf blade: shape | spindle | |
| shaped | |||
| 13. | Leaf blade: apex shape | acuminate | |
| 14. | Leaf blade: base shape | acute | |
| 15 | Leaf blade: wave | weak | |
| 16. | Leaf blade: size | medium | 21.1 cm2 |
| 17. | Leaf blade: length | medium | 8.2 cm |
| 18 | Leaf blade: width | narrow | 3.5 cm |
| 19. | Leaf shape (length/width ratio) | medium | 2.4 |
| 20. | Leaf thickness | medium | 0.34 mm |
| 21. | Leaf vein: clarity of upper surface | slightly clear | |
| 22. | Leaf vein: color of upper surface | soft yellow | JHS 3310 |
| green | |||
| 23. | Leaf color: upper surface | dark green | JHS 4007 |
| 24. | Leaf color: lower surface | soft green | JHS 3709 |
| 25. | Wing shape | vestigial | |
| 26. | Wing length | medium | 13.9 mm |
| 27. | Wing width | narrow | 3.2 mm |
| 28. | Petiole length | medium | 17.7 mm |
| 29. | Petiole diameter (base) | medium | 1.5 mm |
| 30. | Petiole color | soft yellow | JHS 3511 |
| green | |||
| 31. | Peduncle color | soft yellow | JHS 3511 |
| green | |||
| 32 | Inflorescence | single | |
| 33. | Flower weight (beginning of | light | 0.23 g |
| flowering) | |||
| 34. | Petal shape (full flowering) | lanceolate | |
| 35. | Petal length (full flowering) | short | 10.9 mm |
| 36. | Petal width (full flowering) | narrow | 4.9 mm |
| 37. | Petal color (full flowering, outside) | yellowish | JHS 2902 |
| white | |||
| 38. | Petal number | 5 | |
| 39. | Pistil average length | short | 7.9 mm |
| 40. | Stamen average length | short | 6.3 mm |
| 41. | Stamen: average color of anther | yellowish | JHS 2701 |
| white | |||
| 42. | Filament number | few | 17.3 |
| 43. | Filament separation | separating | |
| 44. | Pollens | none | |
| 45. | Ovary shape | compressed | |
| 46. | Style shape | straight | |
| 47. | Fruit: average diameter | medium | 70.1 mm |
| 48. | Fruit: average height | medium | 52.5 mm |
| 49. | Fruit: shape of proximal part | flattened | |
| 50. | Fruit: diameter/height ratio | high | 1.34 |
| 51. | Fruit: shape of distal part | flattened | |
| 52. | Fruit: broadest part | at middle | |
| 53. | Fruit: radial groove at distal part | absent | |
| 54. | Fruit: apex concave ring (circular | absent | |
| depression or disk-shaped | |||
| protuberance around the style scar) | |||
| 55. | Fruit: radial groove at proximal part | very few | 0.6 |
| 56 | Fruit: stalk end depression | absent | |
| 57. | Fruit: collar | absent | |
| 58. | Fruit: shape in transverse section | circular | |
| 59. | Fruit: areola | absent | |
| 60. | Core density | sparse | |
| 61. | Core size (core diameter/fruit | small | 19.1 |
| diameter) | |||
| 62. | Fruit weight | medium | 149.9 g |
| 63. | Skin color | bright orange | JHS 1305 |
| 64. | Albedo color | pale reddish | JHS 2202 |
| orange | |||
| 65. | Oil gland size | mixed, | |
| including | |||
| small, | |||
| medium, | |||
| and large | |||
| 66. | Oil gland number | medium | 66.8 cm2 |
| 67. | Oil gland surface | convex | |
| 68. | Fruit surface | smooth to | |
| medium | |||
| 69. | Fruit surface glossiness | medium | |
| 70. | Amount of albedo adhering to fruit | small | |
| flesh (not including fruit strands) | |||
| 71. | Fruit navel (when viewed internally) | absent | |
| 72. | Fruit average number of segments | many | 13 |
| 73. | Fruit average number of | absent or | |
| rudimentary segments | few | ||
| 74. | Peel thickness | thin | 2.0 mm |
| 75. | Pericarp percentage | small | 16.1% |
| 76. | Peeling | easy to | |
| medium | |||
| 77. | Septum firmness | soft | |
| 78. | Juice sacs shape | medium | |
| 79. | Juice sacs size | medium | |
| 80. | Flesh color | deep orange | JHS 1307 |
| 81. | Juiciness of flesh | juicy | |
| 82. | Sweetness | high | 13.6 (Brix) |
| 83. | Bitterness | not bitter | |
| 84. | Acidity | low | 0.90 g/ |
| 100 ml | |||
| 85. | Seeds/fruit (since there are very | very few | 0.8 on |
| few, the seed characteristics | |||
| were not measured) | average | ||
| 86. | Embryo color (multigerm only) | pale yellow | JHS 3102 |
| green | |||
| 87. | Polyembryony | present | |
| 88. | Sprouting time | medium | early April |
| 89. | Flowering time | medium | early May |
| 90. | Flowering habit | flowering | |
| once | |||
| 91. | Time of maturity | early | January |
| 92. | Fruit shipping quality | moderate | |
| 93. | Fruit storage life | moderate | 1-2 months |
| 94. | Fruit market use | as fresh fruit | |
| 95. | Fruit market productivity | 40 kg/plant | |
OTHER FEATURES OF THE PLANT ARE AS FOLLOWS
[0042]Disease and pest resistance: normal resistance was observed for pests and diseases in Shizuoka-city, Shizuoka Japan, in particular the following pests: thrips, fruit-piercing stink bugs, scales; and the following diseases: Citrus canker, melanose, botrytis fruit injury.
[0043]Tree hardiness: USDA Hardiness Zone: 9a-9b.
Claims
We claim:
1. A new and distinct variety of Citrus sp. tree named ‘HAYASE’, substantially as described and illustrated herein.